I just noticed a couple of my recent posts…. these people have it wrong, and that person has it wrong. One of these days I really need to print something positive and uplifting. But not today. Today I wonder, is counseling what it is cracked up to be?
Excuse the self-flattery, but I like to think of myself as a physician scientist. That concept motivated my PhD work, and cost me friend after friend in the years that followed! A physician scientist isn’t all that difficult to be from an educational standpoint, especially in the age of the internet. The one thing that is necessary is the willingness, or need, to question every assumption by the media, the government, physicians, laypersons, and other scientists. Ideally, the questions are guided by a knowledge of p-values, the process by which scientific grants are awarded, an understanding of the peer-review process, and the realization that anyone elected to office knows less about science than most other humans on the planet.
Last night I came across an opinion piece– I think in the Bangor Daily News, but I could be wrong about that– that argued that we will never stem the heroin epidemic without use of medications. The comment section after the article was filled with the usual angry banter over methadone and buprenorphine that now follows every article about medication assisted treatment. As an aside, why are the abstinence-based treatment people so angry about medication? There are people out there who choose to treat cancer using crystals, but they don’t spend time bashing monoclonal antibodies!
Here is the part of this post where I start losing friends… but let me first say that I know some counselors. I like counselors. In fact, some of my best friends are counselors. But in the comments after that article I read the same thing over and over– that meds aren’t the important thing, and that counseling is what really makes all the difference. A couple weeks ago the person sitting to my right said the same thing during a discussion about medication-assisted treatments. And that same phrase is repeated ad nauseum in lecture after lecture in ASAM lectures and policy statements related to addiction. The phrase has even been codified into some state laws. And why not? It is something we all ‘know’, after all.
If we are going so far as writing laws requiring that people have counseling in order to obtain medication, shouldn’t we do one thing first? Shouldn’t we determine if the comment is really true?
A couple years ago two papers came out– someone help me with the reference if you have them– that looked at abstinence rates after a year on buprenorphine in patients with or without counseling. Guess what? The counseling group did not do better! In fact, the counseled patients did worse; not sigificantly so, but enough to clearly show that there was no ‘trend’ toward better performance in the counseled group (which would have been pointed out, were it true.)
I could hypothesize many reasons why the counseled groups would do worse. Maybe they were angered by the forced counseling and therefore bonded less effectively with their physician. Maybe they obtained a false sense of expertise in dealing with addiction, making them more likely to relapse, whereas the non-counseled group learned to just do as they were told. Or maybe the counselors send out signals, consciously or unconsciously, that interfered with medication treatment.
The thing is, we have no idea which of these things, if any, are going on! There have been no systematic studies or other attempts to understand what happens during the combination of counseling and medication treatments. We just have a bunch of people saying ‘do them both! do them both!– a comment that apparently feels so good to some people that they just cannot consider things any other way.
For the record, I see ALL my patients for at least 30 minutes for every appointment. As a Board Certified Psychiatrist, I guess that means I’m counseling them. And from what I can tell, it seems to be working pretty well. But even in my own case, I would never draw firm conclusions unless someone does a double-blind study and collects the data.
I encourage all physicians, scientists or not, to question some of what we ‘know’ about addiction treatment. Is it really all about the counseling? Maybe— but then again, smart people used to ‘know’ the world was flat, and the Earth was the center of the Universe.